|
Thursday, October 5, 2006
Candidates play Ohio's economic
woes to their advantage
By Julie Carr Smyth
Akron Beacon Journal - AP
CINCINNATI - Candidates for Ohio governor
differ in their approaches to solving the state's economic problems, but
they also differed Wednesday on several of the facts involved.
Republican nominee Ken Blackwell often repeated a claim during the third
debate between him and Democrat Ted Strickland that Strickland's plans
will take a generation to take effect, a lag Blackwell says Ohio can't
afford.
His campaign says the premise for the claim is that Strickland proposes
waiting and watching how Ohio's new tax reforms play out, investing in
college accounts - the first of which won't come due for 18 years - and
heavily pushing resources into early childhood education rather than
immediate job creation programs.
The Strickland camp defends its Turnaround Ohio plan as having both short-
and long-term aspects. Spokesman Keith Dailey said many of Strickland's
proposals would immediately affect families, such as expanded health
screenings and preschool access and expanded work force development
opportunities. Strickland, a congressman, also supports the minimum wage
increase on November's ballot as a positive for 700,000 Ohioans.
Strickland's claim during the debate that Blackwell's flat-tax proposal
would raise taxes for 60 percent of Ohioans is also a point of contention.
The plan would take the income tax rate for all Ohioans to 3.25 percent
over several years.
Strickland's figure came from Cleveland-based Policy Matters Ohio, which
recently reported that 61 percent of Ohio taxpayers would pay more in
state income taxes if Blackwell's proposal were enacted, while only 16
percent would pay less.
Blackwell spokesman Carlo LoParo said the analysis doesn't take into
account the effects of tax exemptions, which the Blackwell plan would
retain, on actual tax payments. He said Ohioans making under $20,000 pay
no income tax under the plan. Under recently enacted tax changes, Ohioans
making under $10,000 already pay no income taxes.
Blackwell, the secretary of state, called Strickland a tax-and-spender
with 83 votes for taxes or against tax relief in Congress. Blackwell's
campaign said Strickland had repeatedly opposed tax cuts, tax reductions
and tax breaks.
Strickland also has voted for some tax reductions and tax credits. And
some of the votes cited by Blackwell are such stands as Strickland's vote
against President Bush's tax cut package, which many Democrats opposed
because they said the package helped the wealthy with little relief for
middle-income taxpayers. Another Strickland vote was to balance the
federal budget.
Blackwell has focused on Strickland's absence rate and his lack of success
in passing bills, something not uncommon among minority party members. He
also points to the high poverty rate in Strickland's rural, southeastern
Ohio district.
"What makes us think that a man who can't turn around his district can
turn around Ohio?" Blackwell asked.
Strickland said he played a role in saving jobs at Wheeling-Pittsburgh
Steel, helped preserve jobs and health benefits at the uranium enrichment
plant in Piketon and helped laid-off coal miners get government resources
for retraining.
---
Associated Press Writer Dan Sewell contributed to this report.
Akron Beacon Journal 12/12/2006
Fair Use Notice
|