Program use is brief, targeted, requires work participation
Public assistance programs keep poverty at bay while supporting work participation, particularly for families with children. The Cato Institute’s “Work Versus Welfare: 2013” starts from a flawed premise that families who draw on safety net programs do not work. The study ignores the new realities of the nation’s public assistance programs:
- The share of poor families that receive TANF benefits, the starting point for the Cato analysis, is tiny. Most who receive assistance do so for short periods of time;
- All of the benefits included in the analysis go in part to working families;
- The vast majority of non-elderly, non-disabled safety net recipients live in households with adults who are attached to the labor force;
- A significant body of research shows that public benefits do not discourage work and demonstrates the positive benefits of the safety net.
For more information
- “Various Supports for Low-Income Families Reduce Poverty and Have Long-Term Positive Effects On Families and Children” at www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3997.
- “Testimony of Robert Greenstein, President, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Before the Senate Budget Committee February 13, 2013” at www.cbpp.org/files/2-13-13pov-test.pdf.
- “TANF Emerging from the Downturn a Weaker Safety Net” at www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3915.
Lame duck is an opportunity for legislators to act on data centers (and more)